menu

about

Internaut & Life Enthusiast.

7/19/10
souls still searching

nydailyads.com

free counters
Free counters

Designed by Ryan Jay
Powered by Tumblr
Theme "Ride your bike"

Non-lethal weapons are designed to hurt people

squashed:

There seems to be some confusion regarding appropriate and inappropriate use of weapons on non-violent protestors. Let’s clear up three things.

Non-violence is not the same as non-forceful or legal. A protester sitting in a sidewalk in violation of the law and in direct contravention of a police order is not a violent protester. A protest blocking a sidewalk or building may be a forceful protest, but is still not a violent protest.

Non-lethal weapons are still weapons. They’re designed to hurt people. One of the serious dangers with a rise of non-lethal weapons is that they are used punitively or with an intent to compel compliance with non-emergency orders. Where a cop might hesitate to shoot a row of students sitting on a sidewalk showing no apparent signs of aggression, apparently the same hesitation does not apply to casually spraying them with pepper spray. Use of weapons is violence.

Using violence to clear a non-violent protest in a non-emergency situation is an absurd abuse of force. I don’t mind the police showing up to clear a protest that is deliberately obstructing people from exercising their rights to get where they need to be. I don’t mind them wearing riot gear when they’re obviously concerned about a riot. I don’t even mind them showing up with over-whelming force. That’s another good way to avoid a riot. But look at what happened. You’ve got a police officer spraying pepper spray on a group of students who are just sitting on a sidewalk. There was no emergency need to clear that sidewalk. Anybody could simply have walked around the protestors. If the protestors had refused to move after appropriate warning was given, the police simply could have recorded the protests, issued citations, and pressed trespassing charges. It’s not difficult to identify who is in the pictures—and we have an entire judicial process we could clog with protestors … if it were important enough to bother with. This isn’t a riot. These are students sitting on a sidewalk. Nobody needs to get hurt.

I have plenty of sarcastic things to say about Occupy Wall Street. I’m old. I’m cranky. I want them off my lawn. But this is beyond the pale. There should be a full investigation. Officers should be disciplined, dismissed, and likely charged with assault. I want some very specific answers on what happened there and why. Why violently disperse a protest rather than, say, walk around it?

And I think U.C. Davis Chancellor Linda P.B. Katehi will probably need to step down.

Reblogged from squashed with 227 notes | Permalink

  1. dashdotdashbackslash reblogged this from andrewgraham
  2. suddenlygiraffe reblogged this from squashed
  3. spillover reblogged this from squashed
  4. englishkid reblogged this from laughinacorner
  5. everglade reblogged this from squashed
  6. awoodsy reblogged this from squashed
  7. seesawarsaw reblogged this from squashed
  8. z-0e reblogged this from squashed
  9. cdub654 reblogged this from squashed
  10. lazydrifter reblogged this from squashed
  11. zosky reblogged this from greaterthanlapsed
  12. albyhungry reblogged this from livesoundz
  13. beret reblogged this from squashed and added:
    I’ve disagreed...Squashed’s stance...smart, valuable...
  14. rethinkcapitalism reblogged this from mohandasgandhi
  15. mens-sana-in-corpore-sano reblogged this from mohandasgandhi
  16. centeroftheuniverseashlandva reblogged this from squashed
  17. matttbastard reblogged this from squashed
  18. sterlingsea reblogged this from mohandasgandhi
  19. incoldblood reblogged this from squashed
  20. ch0c0late-chip reblogged this from alyson-noele
  21. almeezie reblogged this from squashed
  22. toiletman reblogged this from silas216